Showing posts with label secular media. Show all posts
Showing posts with label secular media. Show all posts

Sunday, September 22, 2013

My Pope, Our Pope, the Sinner

2013-09-21, Vatican Radio
As a lay observer, I decided to use bullet points to share my interpretation of Pope Francis' recent remarks in the interviews documented by America Magazine. The mainstream media has a practice of quoting everything the Holy Father says with the accuracy of a telephone game. Here is what I gleaned from the interview:

Pope Francis:

  • sees himself as a sinner who was chosen by God.
  • chose not to live in the papal apartment because he prefers community life.
  • takes his prayerful time when making a decision.
  • is irritated when people say that Ignatian spiritual exercises are Ignatian because they are done in silence. They can be done with or without silence. 
  • is close to the mystical movement.
  • had a bit of a bumpy start as a young Jesuit provincial who ran the Society with an authoritative hand.
  • views ministers within the Church who behave badly as spiritually barren.
  • believes that the young Church (view themselves as self-sufficient) and old Church (may try to impose cultural models upon the young) must build a future together.
  • sees the Church as a field hospital after battle - needing to heal and nurture the faithful.
  • believes that a confessor must be neither too rigid, nor too lax.
  • wants the Bishops to leave no one behind, including those who have left the Church or are indifferent.
  • wants all sinners to be treated with mercy.
  • does not speak much about artificial contraception, homosexuality, or abortion because the Church teaching is clear on those subjects - and that they are not at the heart of Christ's message.
  • believes that the Church has a lot of doctrines and for him to focus on only a few incessantly would be wrong.
  • wants the salvific message to be proclaimed first, followed by catechesis.
  • sees the vowed religious as prophets, leaven. 
  • thinks that the volume of complaints sent to the curia in regard to unorthodox practices at a local level are misdirected (I wonder how many are from the Diocese of Rochester). He wants those issues to be reported to the local levels.
  • thinks that the current methods of  the Synod of Bishops may not be a good model and wants to look more at how things were done prior to the Great Schism in 1054.
  • wants us to walk united with differences as this is the way of Jesus.
  • knows that women are different than men, though they are equally important. Functionality and dignity are two very distinct things, and the Church must be clear in the treatment of women in regard to the latter.
  • thinks that the moto proprio of Benedict XVI allowing wider usage of the Tridentine Mass was a good thing, but that we must be careful not to malign the novus ordo.
  • warns that finding God takes patience, and a contemplative attitude
  • believes that if someone says that they met God with total certainty and without a smidgen of doubt, it is not good. If someone believes to have all the answers, God is not with them.
  • said that if a Christian is a legalist, he will find nothing. 
  • believes that those who look for 'exaggerated doctrinal security' have an inward view of things.
  • prefers to say that we must have hope rather than be optimistic. God is hope, and optimism is for humans.
  • thinks that we must get out of a 'laboratory' and into the field. In the field, we can see the bigger picture of what is needed to help others. 
  • views the Church as having been at times brilliant, and at other times in history, unable to think.
  • suffers from a wandering mind in prayer, and sometimes even falls asleep while at adoration (I'm in good company!).
I was a little surprised by a couple of items, but on the whole the interview appears to be rather uneventful. As usual, the mainstream media has created a stir where nothing I would consider 'breaking news' was said. Full disclosure: I had not read any other blog entries, news stories (Catholic or secular) or watched any commentary about the Pope's remarks prior to making this post. After seeing the headlines flood my newsfeed on various social sites, I decided to go directly to the source. I am the first to admit that on +Ponderings+ my focus is often on the very topics (both Abortion and Obama are the most tagged posts) that our Holy Father would view as being more political than spiritual. While thinking about this tendency, I have decided that it is because I hope to have others awakened from a crooked path. I was once lost and want to create a visible waypoint for someone else. Like an ex-smoker preaching about health to a smoker. And with this thought in my heart and on my mind, I close. 

Edited to add: Here is what Bishop Richard Malone of the Diocese of Buffalo had to say about the matter:



Edited again to add: Read what Fr. Z has to say about the liberal (Catholic and non) comments on the Holy Father HERE.

_______________

This was our 400th +Catholic Ponderings+ post!

Monday, May 4, 2009

What are YOU reading?





Read the news the secular media doesn´t want you to see. Subscribe to the National Catholic Register or Faith and Family Magazine.



*I receive nothing from Circle Media for passing along this message. I have subscribed to both publications for years and want to share them with others who aren't interested in the pro-death culture and secular bias found in the mainstream media today.

Friday, January 30, 2009

NBC: Why I Won't Be Watching the Super Bowl

From Zenit:

NBC Sacks Super Bowl Ad Celebrating Life's Potential

Says It's Not Interested in "Political Advocacy"

CHICAGO, Illinois, JAN. 29, 2009 (Zenit.org).- An ad that promotes the potential of all life will not be shown on NBC during the Super Bowl on the grounds that it involves "political advocacy or issues."

After several days of negotiations, an NBC representative in Chicago advised CatholicVote.org on Wednesday of it's decision not to run an ad that features President Barack Obama and concludes with the tagline, "Life: Imagine the Potential."

Brian Burch, president of CatholicVote.org said there was "nothing objectionable in this positive, life-affirming advertisement."

He then noted the irony that while NBC refused their ad for being advocacy-based, an ad of People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals -- an advocacy group -- was rejected because it depicted "a level of sexuality exceeding our standards." The organization was then given a detailed list of edits that would make the spot acceptable.

“NBC claims it doesn’t allow advocacy ads, but that’s not true. They were willing to air an ad by PETA if they would simply tone down the sexual suggestiveness,” said Burch.

“The purpose of our new ad is to spread a message of hope about the potential of every human life, including the life of Barack Obama,” said Burch. “We are now looking at alternative venues to run the ad over the next several weeks.”

The ad aired on BET in Chicago on Inauguration Day. It has become an Internet hit with over 700,000 views in seven days. The ad was in the top 10 "most viewed’" category on YouTube on Inauguration Day, Jan. 20.


CatholicVote
Support Zenit

For NBC to say that it doesn't wish to engage in political advocacy is like saying that the Judas had Jesus' best interest at heart when he took that handful of coins - A bold faced and undeniable LIE. One need only look back at the love affair the network had with now President Obama while he was still a candidate and understand that political advocacy is NBC's specialty. In this video, NBC journalist admits it is difficult to remain objective in regard to Mr. Obama:

Tuesday, January 20, 2009

Pray, Hope, Love

Wednesday, November 12, 2008

Martin Who?


Just when I thought the secular media could sink no lower, I am once again reminded how much I have overestimated their professional journalistic mettle.

I'm sure you've heard about the 'leaks' from 'anonymous sources' within the McCain campaign who claimed that Sarah Palin did not even know that Africa was a continent. Turns out that MSNBC, The New Republic and the LA Times 'uncovered' the source of the information - and that source was one Martin Eisenstadt. Who is he? He is a fictitious character created by some filmmakers who have maintained a blog where 'Martin', a 'McCain advisor' would dish fake dirt. In cyberspace, anything entered into a search box can derive 'hits' and it seems that the blogosphere AND media were quite taken with 'Martin'.

Did anyone think to look into the 'anonymous source(s)'? Journalism 101, anyone? Outlet after outlet regurgitated story after story which was culled from a fake blog written by a man who does not even exist.

Oh, the 'news' outlets who reported the 'leak source' corrected themselves once they found out that they had been duped, but the damage has already been done. Pundits have been wallowing in the 'leaks' for days, continuing to spread lies about Sarah Palin. The mainstream media continues to talk nonstop about Sarah Palin - her geographic prowess, parenting skills, clothing - and it seems that they don't even have much interest in talking about the poster boy they put on a pedestal - which by the way, rivals the tower of babel.

Tsk, tsk.

________